Fear Over Faith: Christian Post Trumpatic Stress
Fear Over Faith: Christian Post Trumpatic Stress
This week on our podcast, we dive into the complexities of Christian support for Donald Trump with Rev. Edwin Perez. The conversation unpacks what this political alignment says about American values and how it impacts the broader faith community.
Christian Support for Trump Despite Contradictions
Over 80% of white evangelical Christians voted for Donald Trump in 2016 and 2020. This unwavering support persisted despite Trump’s criminal record, multiple bankruptcies, and representation of greed. Many religious leaders framed him as a defender of Christian values, focusing on single-issue topics like abortion while sidelining broader principles such as compassion and care for the marginalized.
The Vote Against Marginalized Groups
Overlooked Principles
Many voters aligned with Trump’s policies, prioritizing political gains over the foundational Christian values of love and inclusion. This decision has harmed marginalized communities, particularly LGBTQ+ individuals.
Impact on LGBTQ+ Youth
Religious condemnation fosters “Christian PTSD” among LGBTQ+ youth, leading to higher rates of depression and suicide. LGBTQ+ youth from highly religious families are twice as likely to experience mental health challenges compared to those from supportive families (The Trevor Project, 2022).
Abandonment of Inclusivity
This focus on exclusionary policies has led to widespread disillusionment, with many young people leaving Christianity due to perceived hypocrisy.
Anti-Immigrant Stances and the Caste System
Voting for Trump often reinforced a perceived social hierarchy, pushing immigrants further down the “caste ladder.” A 2020 Pew study found that 60% of white evangelicals view immigrants as a “burden.” Despite biblical teachings about welcoming strangers, many Christians supported policies that alienate Latino and immigrant communities.
Hate or Economic Self-Interest?
Economic False Promises
Trump’s economic policies, such as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (2017), primarily benefited high-income earners, leaving little for middle- and lower-income families. This has raised questions about whether Christians prioritized personal financial gain over community welfare.
Tariff Warning
Trump’s proposed tariffs could drive significant inflation, increasing costs for goods like clothing, electronics, and groceries. These changes would disproportionately impact low-income households, further amplifying economic inequality.
The Exodus from Christianity
Youth Abandoning Faith
The stark contrast between Christian teachings of love and the exclusionary rhetoric against LGBTQ+ individuals and immigrants has driven many young people from the faith.
Christian PTSD
Religious trauma caused by condemnation and judgment has alienated LGBTQ+ youth, contributing to the rise of “nones” (those with no religious affiliation).
This Week in History
Harvey Milk Elected (1977): The first openly gay elected official in California, a landmark for LGBTQ+ representation.
End of the Bracero Program (1964): Shaped immigration policies and impacted thousands of Mexican laborers.
Susan B. Anthony Votes Illegally (1872): Her defiance became pivotal in the women’s suffrage movement.
Closing Reflections
Christian support for Trump reveals troubling contradictions within the faith community. By prioritizing exclusionary policies and personal gain, many Christians have diverged from the core values of compassion and justice. As Rev. Perez highlights, this moment calls for self-reflection on what Christians prioritize and how their choices shape America’s moral fabric.
Listen to the full discussion now. 🎙️
Mass Deportation; Please Hold
Navigating the Complexities of Immigration Policy in America
Immigration is a topic that affects countless lives across the United States, especially within Latino and marginalized communities. Our recent podcast episode delved into the current landscape of immigration policy, discussing its history, recent changes, and the impact on individuals and families.
Understanding Immigration in the Post-Trump Era
The Trump administration's hardline stance on immigration introduced significant changes that reshaped America's approach to asylum, family reunification, and deportation. Policies like "Remain in Mexico" and restrictions on asylum have left lasting impacts, and many of these changes continue to influence immigration policy today, even under new leadership.
DACA: A Lifeline Under Threat
For nearly a decade, the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program has provided young undocumented immigrants brought to the U.S. as children—often called "Dreamers"—with protection from deportation. However, DACA's future remains uncertain. Court battles and political shifts constantly threaten the program, leaving Dreamers and their families in a state of limbo, worried about losing the stability they’ve worked so hard to build.
The Economic Impact of Immigration
One of the less discussed but crucial aspects of immigration is its economic impact. Immigrants contribute to the workforce, often filling essential roles in healthcare, agriculture, construction, and hospitality. They pay billions in taxes, support social security, and bring diversity to the job market. Yet, misinformation often paints immigrants as a burden on the economy, ignoring their role in boosting productivity and lowering consumer prices by providing affordable labor.
Myth vs. Reality: Immigrants and Public Safety
A persistent myth claims that immigration increases crime. Studies, however, have consistently shown that immigrants—both documented and undocumented—are less likely to commit crimes than native-born citizens. Yet, this stereotype continues to fuel anti-immigrant sentiments and affects policies that unjustly target immigrant communities.
Moving Toward a Compassionate, Fact-Based Policy
For America to thrive, we need an immigration policy that is grounded in reality, not fear. Policies must reflect compassion, acknowledging the human stories behind the statistics. The families separated at borders, the Dreamers waiting for stability, and the countless individuals seeking better lives all deserve humane treatment and fair opportunities.
Final Thoughts: Finding Common Ground
Our podcast’s goal is to foster understanding and break down barriers. While immigration is a divisive topic, it’s essential to look at the facts and recognize the contributions immigrants make to our communities and economy. We believe in finding common ground, understanding each other’s perspectives, and working toward policies that honor our country’s values of diversity and opportunity.
The 1946 Mistranslation of the Bible
Introduction
In 1946, a significant change was made in the Revised Standard Version (RSV) of the Bible—a change that would shape Christian teachings on LGBTQ+ people for decades. For the first time, the word “homosexual” appeared in the scripture, a decision made by a group of scholars that would deeply influence theological views and societal attitudes. In our latest podcast episode, we explore the impact of this translation, the concept of “Christian PTSD,” and how the combination of these factors has affected countless lives.
The 1946 Mistranslation: A Turning Point in Biblical Interpretation
The 1946 RSV Bible introduced the term “homosexual” into the scriptures for the first time. This change occurred during the translation of two Greek words—malakoi and arsenokoitai—which historically referred to behaviors related to indulgence and exploitation, rather than a fixed sexual orientation. These terms were used to describe acts that involved exploitation or abusive power dynamics, but not necessarily consensual same-sex relationships.
However, in 1946, the translation committee chose to interpret these terms as “homosexual,” fundamentally altering how Christian communities understood these passages. This shift had profound implications, turning action-based descriptions into an identity, one that many religious communities condemned. It’s crucial to understand that the cultural context of the 1940s was very different from today. Concepts of sexuality were not widely discussed or understood as they are now, and this translation choice reflected the limited perspective of that era.
1959 Letter that Foretold Its Impact
On October 22, 1959, a significant event in the history of Bible translations and LGBTQ+ advocacy took place. David Sheldon Fearon, a 21-year-old seminary student at McGill University’s School of Religious Studies in Montreal, Quebec, wrote a five-page letter to Dr. Luther A. Weigle, the head of the translation team for the newly published Revised Standard Version (RSV) Bible. In this letter, Fearon questioned the translation choice in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10, expressing concerns about how it could be misused.
Fearon’s letter read, in part:
“Since this is a Holy Book of Scripture sacred to the Christian, I am more deeply concerned because well-meaning and sincere, but misinformed and misguided people (those among the clergy not excluded) may use this Revised Standard Version translation of I Corinthians 6: 9-10 as a sacred weapon, not in fact for the purification of the Church, but in fact for injustice against a defenseless minority group which includes the sincere, convicted, spiritually re-born Christian who has discovered himself to be of homosexual inclination from the time of his memory. I write this letter with certain homosexual individuals in mind—Christians who would die for their faith, their Church, and their Lord, but who cannot alter their biological state of being.”
Fearon recognized that the translation of the word “homosexual” was an error, and he feared the potential for it to be weaponized against LGBTQ+ individuals within the church. His letter provided five pages of detailed evidence supporting his concerns, urging for a revision of the text.
Dr. Weigle responded on November 3, 1959, suggesting the alternative phrasing, “those who practice homosexual vices.” Despite their exchange and Dr. Weigle’s acknowledgment of the issue, the revisions were slow to come. It wasn’t until a later meeting that the translation in the 1971 RSV-r changed the term to “sexual perverts.” This was further adjusted in the 1989 New Revised Standard Version (NRSV), which used “male prostitutes & sodomites”, and eventually, in 2022, the term “sodomites” was replaced with “men who engage in illicit sex” to better reflect the original context.
The Impact of The Living Bible
While changes were being made to the RSV, The Living Bible—published in 1971—was quickly gaining popularity, with over 40 million copies sold by the mid-1980s. Its widespread influence was due in part to endorsements from influential figures like Billy Graham, who appreciated its readability. Unlike the RSV, The Living Bible was a paraphrase, not a direct translation from ancient manuscripts.
Kenneth N. Taylor, the creator of The Living Bible, was a layperson rather than a biblical scholar. His goal was to make the Bible more accessible, but his paraphrasing choices also introduced modern terms like“homosexual” into the text. The term appears four times in this version, notably in passages traditionally used to discuss sexual ethics in Christian contexts:
1. 1 Corinthians 6:9-10
2. 1 Timothy 1:10
3. Romans 1:26-27 (paraphrased to include the term)
4. Leviticus 18:22 (paraphrased for clarity)
Taylor’s inclusion of “homosexual” in these passages reflects the cultural context of the 1970s rather than the meanings intended in the original Hebrew and Greek texts. This shift had lasting implications, shaping the beliefs and teachings of many Christian communities and contributing to a climate of exclusion and judgment against LGBTQ+ individuals.
Why the Mistranslation Matters: Questioning with Compassion
For many people of faith, the Bible is not just a book; it’s a sacred guide to life. The idea of questioning its words can feel unsettling, even wrong. But it’s important to recognize that translations are the work of humans, and humans are fallible. The introduction of the term “homosexual” in 1946 wasn’t an act of divine revelation—it was a choice made by scholars, influenced by the cultural norms of their time.
Herman’s personal quote and point of view: “When it comes to Christian faith, I find the unwavering reliance on the Bible perplexing. For me, faith should take precedence over the written word, especially since scriptures are penned by human hands and thus subject to human limitations. If the written word were meant to be the ultimate authority, there would be little need for the dynamic, personal nature of faith. Faith should guide our understanding, allowing us to question and explore translations, always seeking deeper meanings. This, I believe, should be central to Christian practice—using faith to discern truth and remain open to how divine messages might resonate differently across time and culture.”
Revisiting these translation decisions is not about undermining the word of God; it’s about seeking a fuller understanding of what the scriptures were meant to convey. By acknowledging this error, we may recognize that some of the judgments passed on LGBTQ+ individuals are based on a flawed understanding, not on divine decree. This understanding can open the door to a more inclusive and compassionate interpretation of faith.
Christian PTSD: The Trauma of Religious Rejection
For many LGBTQ+ individuals, the rejection they face from religious communities can lead to what is sometimes called “Christian PTSD.” This term describes the emotional and psychological trauma that comes from being taught that one’s identity is inherently sinful. It’s a deeply personal form of trauma that can manifest as anxiety, depression, nightmares, and even suicidal thoughts.
Imagine growing up believing that God is love, yet hearing from your church, your family, and your community that your love is an abomination. This contradiction can create a profound internal conflict, leading many to feel unworthy, not just of human love, but of divine love as well. The 1946 mistranslation plays a significant role in this, as it provided a scriptural basis for exclusion that has been used to justify harmful rhetoric and practices.
The Mental Health Impact: LGBTQ+ Youth at Risk
The mental health toll of religious rejection is especially severe for LGBTQ+ youth. According to a 2023 report from The Trevor Project, 41% of LGBTQ+ youth have seriously considered suicide in the past year, with rates rising to 53% among transgender and nonbinary youth. The rejection that many face at home—often rooted in religious beliefs—makes LGBTQ+ youth 8 times more likely to attempt suicide than those with accepting families.
This isn’t just a statistic; it’s a heartbreaking reality for too many young people who are caught between their faith and their identity. For those raised in conservative religious homes, the message is often clear: they must choose between their true selves and their spiritual community. This choice can leave them feeling isolated and abandoned, both by their families and by the God they were taught to believe in.
Intimacy, Trust, and the Lasting Effects of Christian PTSD
The trauma of religious rejection doesn’t just affect how LGBTQ+ individuals view themselves; it impacts their ability to trust others, form relationships, and find intimacy. When the Bible has been used as a tool of condemnation, it’s difficult to trust religious texts, leaders, or even loved ones who hold those beliefs.
A survey by the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) found that 70% of LGBTQ+ individuals who experienced rejection from religious community’s struggle with intimacy in their romantic relationships. The messages of unworthiness and sinfulness that they internalize often make it hard for them to believe they deserve love. This can create a painful cycle where the very thing they need—connection and understanding—feels impossible to reach.
Religious Hypocrisy and the Decline of Faith
The story of the 1946 mistranslation is not just about words on a page: it’s about the broader impact of religious hypocrisy. During the AIDS crisis of the 1980s, many LGBTQ+ people saw their churches turn away when they needed compassion the most. Instead of offering support, some religious leaders suggested that AIDS was a form of divine punishment.
This period left deep scars on a generation of LGBTQ+ individuals, reinforcing the idea that their suffering was deserved. It also marked a turning point for many, who began to question how a faith based on love could justify such exclusion. This disillusionment is reflected in today’s statistics: nearly 30% of U.S. adults now identify as religiously unaffiliated, according to Pew Research, and church membership has fallen below 50% for the first time in American history.
A Call for Healing: Finding a Way Forward
Despite the pain, many LGBTQ+ individuals are finding ways to heal from religious trauma. Some are rediscovering their faith through more inclusive interpretations of scripture, while others have found peace in leaving organized religion behind. Trauma-informed therapy, support groups, and affirming churches offer spaces where people can begin to reclaim their sense of worth.
Healing starts with understanding. By acknowledging the mistakes of the past, like the 1946 mistranslation, and the harm they have caused, we can work toward a more compassionate future. It’s a process of questioning not for the sake of doubt, but for the sake of deeper faith—one that aligns with the core values of love, acceptance, and empathy.
Conclusion: Moving Toward Empathy
As we reflect on the history of the 1946 RSV translation and the trauma it has caused, we must ask ourselves: What kind of faith do we want to build? How can we ensure that our interpretations of sacred texts bring people closer to love rather than pushing them away?
Misinformation & Disinformation
A Conversation About Misinformation, Voting, and Our Community
Hello, friends. As a proud Latino, I’m writing to you today because we’re at a crucial moment. With so much happening in our world, one thing has become clear: misinformation and disinformation are becoming tools used to mislead us, confuse us, and weaken our power as voters. We cannot let that happen. Our voices and votes matter, but we need to make sure we’re informed and not swayed by false claims or empty promises.
Let’s break this down together. I want to talk to you about how misinformation affects us, especially here in Texas, how certain political figures, including Donald Trump, use disinformation to divide us, and how we can stay vigilant and protect our vote for the candidates who truly have our backs.
1. The Erosion of Trust in Voting: Misinformation and Disinformation
First, let’s talk about what misinformation and disinformation are doing to us, the voters.
We’ve all seen it: claims of election fraud. Trump’s refusal to accept the 2020 election results, his ongoing false claims about election fraud, have shaken the very foundation of our democracy. Even today, he insists that the system is rigged against him. And while some people believe this, the damage is deeper than just one election. This rhetoric leaves many of us wondering, "Can we trust the process at all?"
But it’s more dangerous than just doubting elections. For Latinos, a community that already feels marginalized in many ways, these claims of election fraud only add to the feeling of alienation. When someone tells us our vote might not even be counted, it makes us question whether showing up to vote is even worth it.
We cannot allow ourselves to be silenced this way. Our vote matters. The more we hear that the system is broken, the more disengaged we become—and that’s exactly what they want. Disengagement is a form of voter suppression, and it’s a strategy used to keep power out of our hands.
2. Trump’s Strategy: Misinformation and Division
Now, let’s look at how this plays into Trump’s larger strategy, particularly when it comes to Latino voters. There’s no denying that Trump uses misinformation to his advantage. He targets us, divides us, and sometimes even appeals to us, but in ways that don’t truly serve our best interests.
For example, Trump has often attacked Kamala Harris with misinformation rooted in gender and racial stereotypes. He paints her as extreme or unqualified, playing into harmful narratives about women and people of color. By constantly pushing these divisive messages, he distracts from the real issues—like healthcare, education, and jobs—things we actually care about.
But Trump doesn’t just attack. He also tries to appeal to Latinos who are more assimilated or who prioritize certain values—like economic growth or traditional family values. He’ll say his economic policies are the best, that he’s created the greatest economy for Latinos. But let’s be honest. The tax cuts he brags about? They primarily helped the rich, not working-class families like ours.
For many of us, especially those hit hardest during the pandemic, those policies haven’t improved our day-to-day lives.
3. How We Can Combat Disinformation and Protect Our Vote
So, what can we do about it? How do we cut through the noise, sift through the lies, and make informed decisions?
First, education is key. We have to make sure we’re getting our information from reliable sources. Misinformation often spreads quickly on platforms like Facebook, Twitter, and WhatsApp, especially in our communities where news in Spanish isn’t always fact-checked as thoroughly. Before you share something, take a minute to verify it. There are tools and websites, like fact-checking organizations, like PolitiFact, FactCheck.org or the Washington Post Face Checker, that can help us get the truth.
Second, we need to rely on our community leaders and organizations like UnidosUS and others who are fighting for our rights and our voices to be heard. They’re on the front lines of pushing back against misinformation, and they can provide us with the resources we need to stay informed and make empowered decisions.
Finally, let’s talk about candidates. We need to look for people who really support the common man, not just big corporations or the ultra-rich. Ask yourself: who is going to fight for your healthcare, your job, your kids' education? Who is going to make sure our communities—Latino, LGBTQ family members, working-class—are treated with dignity and respect?
Don’t let disinformation divide us. Don’t let it push us toward candidates who don’t truly have our best interests at heart. We’re stronger when we stand together, informed and engaged.
In Conclusion: It’s Our Future, Let’s Protect It
As we head into another critical election season, let’s stay vigilant. Misinformation and disinformation are out there, but we have the tools to fight back. Let’s make sure we’re voting for candidates who care about us, who will fight for us, and who won’t just feed us lies or pander to our fears.
Let’s stay informed, united, and ready to cast our vote for a better future. For our families. For our community. For all of us.
Remember: Your vote matters—more than ever before.
The Complex Latinx Vote
The Complex Reality of the Latino Vote – Through the Eyes of Latinos and LGBTQ+ Communities
Welcome to His Panic, where we explore the world through Latino and LGBTQ+ perspectives. In our latest podcast, we dive into what makes the Latino vote unique and often misunderstood. Here’s a quick rundown of key points we discussed, all to help shed light on the complexity of Latino voters—and why their voices matter.
Latino Voters Are Not All the Same
There’s a big myth that Latinos all vote the same way. In reality, we’re incredibly diverse. Political views can vary greatly depending on many factors: generation, country of origin, experiences with the U.S. immigration system, or the importance of economic and cultural issues. Some Latinos prioritize job growth, others focus on immigration reform, while many care deeply about cultural representation. The Latino community is a powerful but complex force in elections.
Different Levels of Political Involvement
Unlike African American communities with a deep history in U.S. civil rights movements, the Latino community’s political engagement often looks different. Many Latino voters are first-generation immigrants or come from families with a wide range of experiences with government and democracy. For some, voting is an exciting part of being in America—a privilege to express themselves politically. For others, it's confusing or unfamiliar, stemming from mistrust in political institutions back home or a lack of engagement in the system.
Latinos Are Not a Monolithic Voting Bloc
Latino voters span the entire political spectrum—from conservative to progressive. Religion (such as Catholicism or Evangelical beliefs), economic goals, and national origin all shape preferences. Unlike other demographic groups, there isn’t a one-size-fits-all political label for Latino voters. These varying beliefs challenge stereotypes and make the Latino vote more unpredictable than many think.
LGBTQ+ Latinos Face Unique Challenges
The intersection of being both Latino and LGBTQ+ adds another layer to voting behavior. LGBTQ+ Latinos often lean towards progressive platforms that support equality, but traditional cultural and religious values can pull them in different directions. This tension—between LGBTQ+ rights and traditional family beliefs—is very real and can impact political decisions.
Media Messaging Often Falls Short
When election season comes around, political messaging often doesn’t do justice to the diversity within the Latino community. Both major political parties have sometimes misunderstood Latino needs, focusing primarily on immigration while neglecting healthcare, economic opportunity, and education. More nuanced and inclusive outreach could help bridge this gap and better connect with voters.
Voting as an Expression of Identity
For many Latinos, voting is about expressing who they are and feeling included in their adopted country. Unlike African American voters, who may share a unifying narrative around voter suppression and civil rights, Latino voters are shaped by a variety of backgrounds—some from countries with unstable governments, others who haven’t been exposed to democratic systems. This diverse set of experiences influences how Latinos see voting, whether as a privilege or with skepticism.
Shared Values Can Unite the Latino Vote
Despite the diversity, there are core values that resonate widely within the Latino community. Family, hard work, faith, and a desire for better opportunities for future generations are unifying themes. Campaigns that focus on policies supporting family stability, economic opportunities, healthcare access, and quality education may find common ground across diverse Latino subgroups.
Latino voters, while varied in their experiences and priorities, share many common aspirations. By better understanding these complexities and shared values, we can honor and amplify the voices of Latinos in the political process. Tune in to our latest podcast episode to explore these themes and hear diverse perspectives from within the community!
General Tags:
#LatinoVote
#LGBTQVoices
#DiversityInPolitics
#GetOutTheVote
#RepresentationMatters
#LatinxPower
#PoliticalEngagement
Community-Specific Tags:
#Latinx
#LatinosForChange
#HispanicVoices
#QueerLatinos
#LGBTQLatinx
#FamiliaFirst
#VotaLatino
Trending and Popular Tags:
#PodcastLife
#SocialJustice
#ProgressivePolitics
#Election2024 (or relevant election year)
#CommunityEmpowerment
#Inclusivity
Relevant Cultural Tags:
#LatinoHeritage
#CulturaLatina
#PrideInCommunity
#SomosLatinos
#OrgulloLatino